Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

The Effect of Wolffia globosa Mankai, a Green Aquatic Plant, on Postprandial Glycemic Response: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial

  1. Hila Zelicha1,
  2. Alon Kaplan1,
  3. Anat Yaskolka Meir1,
  4. Gal Tsaban1,
  5. Ehud Rinott1,
  6. Ilan Shelef2,
  7. Amir Tirosh3,4,
  8. Dov Brikner5,
  9. Efrat Pupkin5,
  10. Lu Qi6,
  11. Joachim Thiery7,
  12. Michael Stumvoll7,
  13. Nora Kloting7,
  14. Martin von Bergen7,
  15. Uta Ceglarek7,
  16. Matthias Blüher7,
  17. Meir J. Stampfer8 and
  18. Iris Shai1⇑
  1. 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
  2. 2Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel
  3. 3Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  4. 4Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
  5. 5Department of Medicine, Nuclear Research Center Negev, Dimona, Israel
  6. 6Department of Epidemiology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
  7. 7Department of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  8. 8Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
  1. Corresponding author: Iris Shai, irish{at}bgu.ac.il
  1. H.Z. and A.K. contributed equally to this study.

Diabetes Care 2019 Jul; 42(7): 1162-1169. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-2319
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the postprandial and overnight glycemic response using a novel green aquatic plant thought to provide a dietary source for high-quality protein, with an iso-carbohydrate/protein/caloric dairy shake.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This is a randomized controlled crossover trial among 20 abdominally obese participants (age 51.4 years; fasting plasma glucose 110.9 mg/dL), who were allocated to replace dinner with either, first, a green shake containing Wolffia globosa duckweed (Mankai: specific-strain) or an iso-carbohydrate/protein/calorie yogurt shake. A 2-week flash glucose-monitoring system was used to assess postmeal glucose dynamics (6 net administration days; 97 observation days in total). We further obtained from each participant dietary/daily activity/satiety scale/sleep logs. Participants were recruited from the green-Mediterranean diet arm of the 18-month Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial-Polyphenols Unprocessed (DIRECT-PLUS) study.

RESULTS Wolffia globosa Mankai elicited a lower postprandial glucose peak compared with yogurt (∆peak = 13.4 ± 9.2 vs. 19.3 ± 15.1 mg/dL; P = 0.044), which occurred later (77.5 ± 29.2 vs. 59.2 ± 28.4 min; P = 0.037) and returned faster to baseline glucose levels (135.8 ± 53.1 vs. 197.5 ± 70.2 min; P = 0.012). The mean post–net incremental area under the curve (netAUC) was lower with Wolffia globosa up to 60 and 180 min (netAUC 60 min: 185.1 ± 340.1 vs. 441.4 ± 336.5 mg/dL/min, P = 0.005; netAUC  180 min: 707.9 ± 1,428.5 vs. 1,576.6 ± 1,810.1 mg/dL/min, P = 0.037). A Wolffia globosa–based shake replacing dinner resulted in lower next-morning fasting glucose levels (83.2 ± 0.8 vs. 86.6 ± 13 mg/dL; P = 0.041). Overall, postprandial glucose levels from the shake administration until the next morning were lower in the Wolffia globosa Mankai green shake compared with the yogurt shake (P < 0.001). Overnight sleep duration was similar (378.2 ± 22.4 vs. 375.9 ± 28.4 min; P = 0.72), and satiety rank was slightly higher for the Wolffia globosa shake compared with the yogurt shake (7.5 vs. 6.5; P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS Wolffia globosa Mankai duckweed may serve as an emerging alternative plant protein source with potential beneficial postprandial glycemic effects.

Introduction

Health-related concerns (1–4), sustainability (5), and ideological reasons are common motivations to search for plant-based alternatives for animal protein sources. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics recommends a vegetarian, plant-based diet for primary prevention of obesity, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes (6). To date, the short-term effects of vegetarian, plant-based sources rich in polyphenols, on postprandial glycemia have not been fully characterized. Studies that have measured the acute glycemic response of plants rich in polyphenols suggest a beneficial effect in improving glycemic profile, with a lower glucose peak (7,8).

Wolffia globosa duckweed (Mankai strain), an emerging edible aquatic plant, is rich in protein content (>45% of the dry matter) and includes all nine essential and six conditional amino acids. Recently, we reported that, among humans, the bioavailability of the essential amino acids in Wolffia globosa was similar to the well-established animal (soft cheese) and plant (peas) iso-protein sources (9), highlighting this plant as a high-quality protein source. Moreover, in rat models, iron derived from Wolffia globosa was found to be bioavailable and efficient in treating iron deficiency anemia (10). In the current study, the Wolffia globosa Mankai green shake was designed to provide 12% of the daily recommended intake of protein, 4.3% of carbohydrates, and 1.8% of fat for men, as well as a relatively high dietary fiber content, accounting for 13.5% of the daily recommended intake. In addition, this aquatic plant is highly rich in polyphenols, mainly phenolic acids and flavonoids (including catechins). The aim of this crossover trial was to assess the postprandial and overnight glycemic response after Wolffia globosa Mankai administration compared with an iso-carbohydrate/protein/caloric dairy protein shake (yogurt) among abdominally obese adults.

Research Design and Methods

Study Design

This crossover trial is a substudy of the Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial-Polyphenols Unprocessed (DIRECT-PLUS) (clinical trial reg. no. NCT03020186, ClinicalTrials.gov) study that began in May 2017. The DIRECT-PLUS study included 294 participants, who were enrolled from an isolated workplace (Nuclear Research Center Negev, Dimona, Israel). Inclusion criteria for the DIRECT-PLUS study were age >30 years with abdominal obesity (waist circumference: men >102 cm; women >88 cm) and/or dyslipidemia (triglycerides >150 mg/dL; HDL cholesterol: men ≤40 mg/dL; women ≤50 mg/dL). Exclusion criteria for the DIRECT-PLUS study were the inability to take part in physical activity (PA) in the gym, serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dL, disturbed liver function tests, major illness that might require hospitalization, pregnancy, the presence of active cancer, receiving or having received chemotherapy in the previous 3 years, participation in another trial, treatment with coumadin (warfarin), or possessing a pacemaker or metal implant. Among randomized participants assigned to one of the intervention groups (the PA+green-Mediterranean diet group), we selected individuals capable of using a glucose-monitoring system. Specific exclusion criteria for the crossover trial were lactose intolerance or milk allergy and the use of antihyperglycemic medications and/or insulin. Participants were defined as having type 2 diabetes if their fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration was ≥126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). Prediabetes was defined as FPG between 100 and 125 mg/dL or HbA1c levels between 5.7% and 6.4% (39–47 mmol/mol) (11).

Intervention

This 2-week crossover substudy was performed in the initial phase of the DIRECT-PLUS study (Supplementary Fig. 1) in one phase. A flash glucose-monitoring system device (Freestyle Libre; Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, Oxon, U.K.) was used (Supplementary Data). The two shakes, Wolffia globosa duckweed (Mankai) and yogurt, were consumed by each participant at 7:00 p.m., instead of dinner. The shake-type order was randomized (simple randomization and random allocation), and the shakes were given at the same time at the specific hour in the evening (Supplementary Fig. 1). The participants were requested to refrain from food and drink intake 1 h before shake consumption and from shake consumption until the next morning. The participants were instructed to avoid strenuous PA 5 h prior to the shake consumption, without further instructions for a specific sequence or timing of exercise. The 2 weeks of glucose monitoring included a total of 6 administration days, 3 days for each shake. Shakes were not administered during weekends, holidays, and on the first day after inserting the sensor, although the sensors were used continuously for 14 days. Of the 23 initial participants, 3 dropped out for technical reasons. We excluded 23 observation days in which preadministration glucose levels were measured at >100 mg/dL. This was done in order to standardize the initial levels before the test.

The Wolffia globosa Mankai green shake included three frozen cubes of the plant (25 g each), while the yogurt shake included 100 g low-fat yogurt with no added sweetener. Both shakes included 28 g walnuts and one medium-sized banana. The two shakes were iso-caloric (366 kcal in the Wolffia globosa Mankai shake; 351 kcal in the yogurt shake) and equivalent in terms of macronutrient content (carbohydrates: 35 g in both the Wolffia globosa and yogurt shakes; protein: 12 g in the Wolffia globosa shake; 11 g in the yogurt shake; fat: 20 g in the Wolffia globosa shake; 19 g in the yogurt shake). Regardless of the equal degree of carbohydrate content, the Wolffia globosa plant shake naturally included 9 g dietary fibers, compared with the natural yogurt shake with 5 g dietary fibers. We did not add any further supplements or components to the shakes.

Adherence to the intervention protocol was assessed using a detailed dietary (including time and portion size), daily activity, satiety scale (rank 1–10) and sleep recall during these 2 weeks. Text messages were sent on a daily basis as a reminder for maintaining study protocol instructions. The Soroka University Medical Center Medical Ethics Board and Helsinki Committee approved the trial protocol. All participants provided written informed consent and received no financial compensation or gifts. The Mankai and walnuts were provided free of charge.

Statistical Analysis

This is a crossover trial as part of the 18-month DIRECT-PLUS trial. Although the primary aim of the long-term DIRECT-PLUS trial was to assess changes in abdominal and hepatic fat, our specific aim here was to specifically assess the acute glycemic effects of a Wolffia globosa–based versus yogurt-based dinner shake, measured by a continuous glucose monitoring system. The power calculation for the postprandial glycemic effect is based on a randomized crossover trial that compared the effect of berries as a polyphenol source in comparison with a similar sucrose load among 12 healthy subjects (8). The trial demonstrated a significant difference in the glycemic profiles (division of time [min] during which the plasma glucose was above the fasting concentration with the incremental peak value [mmol/L]) between berries and the control meals (49.9 ± 21.1 vs. 24.7 ± 9.3 min/(mmol/L), P = 0.003). Therefore, the calculated power for our study was 90.9%. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± SD, unless specified otherwise. Nominal variables are expressed as numbers and percentages. Variables were tested for normal distribution using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Baseline characteristics are presented for each group and for the entire study population. Differences in baseline characteristics were tested by Mann-Whitney test. We assessed the differences within subjects by measuring the mean net incremental area under the curve (netAUC) (12,13) of glucose at 60 and 180 min after the administration of the shake, and overnight glucose profile. In addition, we calculated the following personal glycemic parameters: glucose time to peak, postprandial glucose peaks, time until glucose levels returned to baseline, next-morning fasting glucose, sleep duration, and satiety rank using the Wilcoxon test. Observation day was recorded based on the time from shake administration until the next morning. Additionally, we performed a mixed-model analysis over time (3 days, 15-min intervals on average) as a within-subject test and the shake meal group as a between-subject factor, with the primary outcome being the glucose level. We used exploratory analysis to determine the differences between time points that were expressed as absolute values unless specified otherwise. Glucose trajectory similarities were assessed using dynamic time warping (DTW); all 97 postprandial 180-min observations were used to create a distance matrix, and interindividual and intraindividual distances were subsequently extracted and compared by Mann-Whitney test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 (two sided). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22.0) software. Power calculations were performed using WinPepi software, version 11.6. Graphs were constructed using GraphPad Prism 7.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics of all participants and baseline characteristics of participants by sequence of shake administration are shown in Table 1. We randomized 23 participants in a crossover design to first consume either a Wolffia globosa (Mankai) shake (n = 12) or a yogurt shake (n = 11). After installation of the flash glucose-monitoring system device, and prior to shake administration, the sensor was detached in three participants; thus, there were no data of glycemic response to the shakes for these three participants. The initial randomization table is shown in Supplementary Table 3. The 20 participants were randomized to Mankai shake first (n = 10) or yogurt shake first (n = 10) groups and collected a total of 97 observation days. Of the 20 participants who completed the intervention, 13 participants had prediabetes and 1 participant had type 2 diabetes. Eighteen participants were men, the mean age was 51.4 ± 11.2 years, and the mean weight was 91.1 ± 15.3 kg. The mean FPG level was 110.9 ± 16.2 mg/dL, with a mean HbA1c of 5.5 ± 0.7% (36.8 ± 7.3 mmol/mol). Baseline parameters were similarly distributed between the groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population across groups in the continuous glucose crossover trial (n = 20)

Glycemic Response

The glucose trajectory overnight after Wolffia globosa (Mankai) shake and yogurt shake intakes are presented in Fig. 1, and the glycemic indices are presented in Supplementary Table 4. The consumption of the Wolffia globosa shake elicited lower postprandial glucose peaks (∆ = 13.4 ± 9.2 mg/dL) compared with the yogurt shake (∆ = 19.3 ± 15.1 mg/dL; P = 0.044). Wolffia globosa shake consumption induced a longer time to reach peak glucose levels compared with the yogurt shake (77.5 ± 29.2 vs. 59.2 ± 28.4 min, respectively; P = 0.037) and a lower mean netAUC after 60 min (Wolffia globosa 185.1 ± 340.1 mg/dL/min; yogurt 441.4 ± 336.5 mg/dL/min; P = 0.005) and after 180 min (Wolffia globosa 707.9 ± 1,428.5 mg/dL/min; yogurt 1,576.6 ± 1,810.1 mg/dL/min; P = 0.037). The overnight mean netAUC was not significantly different after the consumption of a Wolffia globosa shake versus a yogurt shake (743.9 ± 5,141.8 vs. 2,733.1 ± 5,589.3 mg/dL/min, respectively; P = 0.069). Wolffia globosa consumption was associated with lower next-morning fasting glucose concentration (83.2 ± 0.8 vs. 86.6 ± 13 mg/dL; P = 0.041). The Wolffia globosa Mankai shake resulted in significantly lower postprandial glucose levels when measured 15, 30, 45, 60, and 150 min following the ingestion, compared with the yogurt shake (P < 0.05 for all). Glucose levels returned to baseline values faster after the consumption of the Wolffia globosa shake (mean 135.8 ± 53.1 min) than after consumption of the yogurt shake (mean 197.5 ± 70.2 min; P = 0.012). Participants with dysglycemic FPG levels at baseline (FPG ≥100; n = 14) also exhibited a significantly lower next-morning fasting glucose concentration in the Wolffia globosa compared with the yogurt shake (84.0 ± 12.2 vs. 88.1 ± 14.5 mg/dL, respectively; P = 0.028). Overall, postprandial glucose levels, from the time of administration of the shake replacing dinner until the following morning, were significantly lower after the Wolffia globosa Mankai shake than the yogurt shake (P < 0.001). The order of intervention group allocation did not affect the results (P > 0.05). A secondary sensitivity analysis that included all ob`servations (i.e., without exclusion of individual measurements, as described above) revealed similarly significant differences between groups, as observed in the original analysis. This included the following parameters: postprandial glucose peak; mean netAUC after 60 and 180 min; postprandial glucose levels after 15, 30, 45, and 150 min; next-morning fasting glucose level; and postprandial repeated glucose levels from the time of administration until the following morning. However, differences in the time to peak glucose level and in the postprandial glucose level after 60 min lost their statistical significance. Nevertheless, in this inclusive analysis of all measurements, the overnight mean netAUC and other overnight time points became significantly lower in the Mankai intervention arm compared with the yogurt intervention arm (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 5).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Glucose trajectory overnight after Wolffia globosa (Mankai) and yogurt intake. *P < 0.05 differences between groups, **P < 0.01 differences between groups. a shows that the overall, postprandial repeated glucose levels from the administration of the shake until the next morning were significantly lower in the Mankai shake group compared with the yogurt shake group (P < 0.001). Differences were analyzed by mixed model over time as a within-subject test, and the shake meal group as a between-subject factor. b shows a significant difference in the mean netAUC (0–60 and 0–180 min). The netAUC after 60 min (yogurt 441.4 ± 336.5 mg/dL/min; Mankai 185.1 ± 340.1 mg/dL/min; P = 0.005); the netAUC after 180 min (yogurt 1,576.6 ± 1,810.1 mg/dL/min; Mankai 707.9 ± 1,428.5 mg/dL/min; P = 0.037). Differences within subjects were analyzed by Wilcoxon test. c shows a significant difference in glucose peaks (13.4 ± 9.2 vs. 19.3 ± 15.1 mg/dL; P = 0.044) and a significant difference in time to peaks (77.5 ± 29.2 vs. 59.2 ± 28.4 min; P = 0.037). Differences within subjects were analyzed by Wilcoxon test. d shows a significant difference in next-morning fasting glucose concentration (83.2 ± 0.8 vs. 86.6 ± 13.0 mg/dL; P = 0.041). The difference within subjects was analyzed by Wilcoxon test.

Logs

According to participant’s records, the median post-shake satiety rank for Wolffia globosa Mankai was 7.5, while for yogurt it was 6.5 (P = 0.035). There was no significant difference in the sleep duration after Wolffia globosa Mankai consumption compared with a yogurt-based meal (378.2 ± 22.4 vs. 375.9 ± 28.4 min; P = 0.72). All participants reported refraining from strenuous PA for at least 5 h prior to shake consumption.

Individual Patterns

The individual continuous blood glucose levels are presented in Fig. 2. We compared intraindividual (within persons–between treatments) Mankai-yogurt 180-min glucose excursions with interindividual (between persons–within treatments) Mankai-Mankai and yogurt-yogurt 180-min glucose excursions using DTW distances and accounting for all recorded observations. The intraindividual responses were significantly closer in DTW measure than the interindividual responses (intraindividual responses 43.3 ± 2.4; interindividual responses 48.6 ± 0.5; P = 0.004), suggesting that the glucose trajectory response of each participant was personally characterized with similar patterns for either intervention.

  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Individual glucose responses to both shake meals. The mean glucose distribution of each individual response among 20 participants in the crossover trial. DTW distance of intraindividual response (43.3 ± 2.4) vs. DTW of interindividual responses (48.6 ± 0.5, P = 0.004). All 97 postprandial 180-min observations were used to create a distance matrix; interindividual and intraindividual distances were subsequently extracted and compared by Mann-Whitney test.

Conclusions

In this crossover randomized controlled trial comparing glucose excursions in response to iso-carbohydrate/caloric meals of Wolffia globosa (Mankai) versus yogurt shakes, the glucose response to the Wolffia globosa–containing shake was apparently slightly favorable, with the effect being discernable from the time of the meal (i.e., at dinner) until the following morning. Furthermore, glucose peaks were lower, times to glucose peaks were delayed, and the netAUCs of the first hour and after 3 hours were smaller. These results suggest that Wolffia globosa, which is naturally rich in dietary fibers and polyphenols, may constitute an alternative iso-protein/carbohydrate shake with a beneficial glycemic response.

Several limitations should be considered. This specific substudy included individuals with abdominal obesity but mostly with normal FPG levels or prediabetes. Thus, our findings cannot be generalized to patients with diabetes. Furthermore, the participants were recruited from the PA+green-Mediterranean dietary intervention arm of the DIRECT-PLUS study, with an energy restriction and elevated PA, and do not represent the general population. Although we monitored exercise performance 5 h prior to shake administration, data regarding the timing of the exercise with respect to meals was only available regarding this time frame. Nevertheless, as this is a crossover trial, and comparisons are between interventions within the same subjects, it is unlikely that participants altered their daily routine pattern of exercise when switching between the two types of shakes. Moreover, as a consequence of the sex profile of workers in the workplace setting studied, the majority were men. Finally, we randomized only 20 participants. Nevertheless, this relatively small sample provided sufficient statistical power to detect a significant difference between the Mankai and yogurt groups over nearly 100 repeated days of observations in a crossover design. Study strengths included its one-phase randomized controlled design, in which all participants started intervention on the same day, a strict and detailed lifestyle log (dietary, including time frames and portion size, daily activity, and sleep and arising recall), and that the two intervention arms were identical in the energetic and macronutrient content.

The glucose excursion following the consumption of Wolffia globosa was apparently favorable compared with that of yogurt. This effect could be explained by the unique nutritional properties of Wolffia globosa, such as the high fiber content and polyphenol levels that are absent in yogurt. These components may minimize postprandial glucose peaks (7,8,14,15) as well as lower the glycemic index beyond the impact associated with carbohydrate quantity. Previous studies (16–18) demonstrated a beneficial effect of dietary fibers on insulin resistance among patients with type 2 diabetes and subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, and showed that those dietary fibers can lower the risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Moreover, in our study, we found that the Wolffia globosa shake was more satiating compared with the yogurt shake, an effect potentially attributable to the difference in fiber content. Furthermore, polyphenols, which are abundant in the Wolffia globosa, can exert anti-inflammatory effects and may influence glucose metabolism through different mechanisms, including by inhibiting glucose absorption in the gut, decreasing fasting insulin levels (19–21), and reducing insulin resistance (22,23). Some hypoglycemic effects were observed with polyphenols ingested shortly before glucose consumption (23,24) and have been associated with a reduced incidence of type 2 diabetes (25–27).

Our previous study (9) aimed to evaluate the bioavailability of essential amino acids in Mankai compared with a dairy iso-protein (soft cheese). We found that the increase in plasma branched-chain amino acids (leucine/isoleucine and valine) concentrations occurred relatively faster in the cheese group compared with the Mankai group (9). Possibly, these results may relate to recent evidence suggesting that plasma branched-chain amino acids, which are common in dairy products, are associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (28). We further analyzed the postprandial glucose and insulin blood levels in the bioavailability test (9) (Supplementary Fig. 6) and found that although the Mankai dish included, in the overall recipe, much higher content of carbohydrates than the iso-protein cheese meal, the insulin levels induced after Mankai consumption were significantly lower than those induced after cheese consumption, whereas glucose levels similarly decreased in all time points.

The initial postprandial glucose response (0–30 min) during a glucose tolerance test might mainly reflect the suppression of hepatic glucose production (29). The higher initial rise in glucose levels reflects greater hepatic insulin resistance or deficient pancreatic β-cell function (29). After ∼120–180 min, hepatic glucose production is maximally suppressed (30). Thus, the glucose levels declining to the nadir indicate glucose uptake by peripheral tissues, specifically, muscle. We observed a lower glucose peak, a smaller netAUC after 60 and 180 min, and a faster decline from the glucose peak level back to baseline after green shake consumption compared with yogurt shake consumption. Our findings suggest that the beneficial glucose excursion in response to the Wolffia globosa Mankai green shake may represent a combined effect of a lower glycemic index and a better insulin response.

Although the Mankai group demonstrated a beneficial glycemic response compared with the yogurt group, we observed different patterns of glucose response between subjects. Indeed, we found that the individual pattern is more pronounced than the intervention itself. A previous study (31) showed a wide variety between glucose responses in subjects who consumed the exact same meal. Since our trial was a crossover study, we could compare the shakes in our study group beyond the interpersonal differences.

In conclusion, our study suggests that Wolffia globosa (Mankai) may serve as a new alternative protein source with potential beneficial postprandial glycemic effects.

Article Information

Acknowledgments. The authors thank the DIRECT-PLUS participants for their significant contribution. The authors also thank Professor Assaf Rudich, Dr. Lena Novak, and Professor Michael Friger from Ben-Gurion University; and Benny Sarusi, Eyal Goshen, and Avi Ben Shabat from the Nuclear Research Center Negev for their valuable contribution. In addition, the authors thank California Walnuts for providing the walnuts, and Hinoman Ltd. for providing the Wolffia globosa (Mankai).

Funding. This work was supported by grants from The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), Projektnummer 209933838, SFB 1052; the DFG, Obesity Mechanisms; Israel Ministry of Health (grant 87472511); Israel Ministry of Science and Technology (grant 3-13604); and the California Walnuts Commission.

None of the foundations were involved in any stage of the design, conduct, or analysis of the study, and had no access to the study results before publication.

Duality of Interest. I.Sha. advises the nutritional committee of Hinoman Ltd. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. H.Z., A.K., A.Y.M., G.T., E.R., I.She., A.T., D.B., E.P., L.Q., J.T., M.S., N.K., M.v.B., U.C., M.B., M.J.S., and I.Sha. had full access to all of the data in the study, take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis, and read and approved the final manuscript. H.Z., A.K., J.T., M.S., N.K., M.v.B., U.C., and M.B. analyzed the data. H.Z., A.K., and I.Sha. designed the research, conducted the study, wrote the manuscript, and are responsible for the final content. A.Y.M., G.T., E.R., D.B., and E.P. conducted the study. I.She., A.T., and L.Q. reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.J.S. designed the research, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. H.Z. and A.K. are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Footnotes

  • Clinical trial reg. no. NCT03020186, clinicaltrials.gov

  • This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/dc18-2319/-/DC1.

  • Received November 6, 2018.
  • Accepted March 28, 2019.
  • © 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Pan A,
    2. Sun Q,
    3. Bernstein AM, et al
    . Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:555–563pmid:22412075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Micha R,
    2. Wallace SK,
    3. Mozaffarian D
    . Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2010;121:2271–2283pmid:20479151
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chalvon-Demersay T,
    2. Azzout-Marniche D,
    3. Arfsten J, et al
    . A systematic review of the effects of plant compared with animal protein sources on features of metabolic syndrome. J Nutr 2017;147:281–292pmid:28122929
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Song M,
    2. Fung TT,
    3. Hu FB, et al
    . Association of animal and plant protein intake with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1453–1463pmid:27479196
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Wu G,
    2. Fanzo J,
    3. Miller DD, et al
    . Production and supply of high-quality food protein for human consumption: sustainability, challenges, and innovations. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014;1321:1–19pmid:25123207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Melina V,
    2. Craig W,
    3. Levin S
    . Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: vegetarian diets. J Acad Nutr Diet 2016;116:1970–1980pmid:27886704
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Törrönen R,
    2. Sarkkinen E,
    3. Tapola N,
    4. Hautaniemi E,
    5. Kilpi K,
    6. Niskanen L
    . Berries modify the postprandial plasma glucose response to sucrose in healthy subjects. Br J Nutr 2010;103:1094–1097pmid:19930765
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Törrönen R,
    2. Sarkkinen E,
    3. Niskanen T,
    4. Tapola N,
    5. Kilpi K,
    6. Niskanen L
    . Postprandial glucose, insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 responses to sucrose ingested with berries in healthy subjects. Br J Nutr 2012;107:1445–1451pmid:21929838
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kaplan A,
    2. Zelicha H,
    3. Tsaban G, et al
    . Protein bioavailability of Wolffia globosa duckweed, a novel aquatic plant, a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 11 December 2018 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.009
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Yaskolka Meir A,
    2. Tsaban G,
    3. Zelicha H, et al
    . A green Mediterranean diet, low in meat and supplemented with duckweed, does not impair iron homeostasis in obese, dyslipidemic adults or rats. J Nutr. 27 Mar 2019 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxy321
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. American Diabetes Association
    . Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care 2018;41(Suppl. 1):S1–S2pmid:29222369
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Wolever TM
    . The Glycaemic Index: A Physiological Classification of Dietary Carbohydrate. Wallingford, UK, CABI, 2006
  11. ↵
    1. Gannon MC,
    2. Nuttall FQ,
    3. Westphal SA,
    4. Neil BJ,
    5. Seaquist ER
    . Effects of dose of ingested glucose on plasma metabolite and hormone responses in type II diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 1989;12:544–552
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. de Munter JSL,
    2. Hu FB,
    3. Spiegelman D,
    4. Franz M,
    5. van Dam RM
    . Whole grain, bran, and germ intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and systematic review. PLoS Med 2007;4:e261pmid:17760498
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Barclay AW,
    2. Petocz P,
    3. McMillan-Price J, et al
    . Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk--a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:627–637pmid:18326601
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Cho SS,
    2. Qi L,
    3. Fahey GC Jr.,
    4. Klurfeld DM
    . Consumption of cereal fiber, mixtures of whole grains and bran, and whole grains and risk reduction in type 2 diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:594–619pmid:23803885
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ye EQ,
    2. Chacko SA,
    3. Chou EL,
    4. Kugizaki M,
    5. Liu S
    . Greater whole-grain intake is associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and weight gain. J Nutr 2012;142:1304–1313pmid:22649266
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Reynolds A,
    2. Mann J,
    3. Cummings J,
    4. Winter N,
    5. Mete E,
    6. Te Morenga L
    . Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses [published correction appears in Lancet 2019;393:406]. Lancet 2019;393:434–445pmid:30638909
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Hsu CH,
    2. Tsai TH,
    3. Kao YH,
    4. Hwang KC,
    5. Tseng TY,
    6. Chou P
    . Effect of green tea extract on obese women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr 2008;27:363–370pmid:18468736
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kao YH,
    2. Hiipakka RA,
    3. Liao S
    . Modulation of endocrine systems and food intake by green tea epigallocatechin gallate. Endocrinology 2000;141:980–987pmid:10698173
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Boušová I,
    2. Matoušková P,
    3. Bártíková H, et al
    . Influence of diet supplementation with green tea extract on drug-metabolizing enzymes in a mouse model of monosodium glutamate-induced obesity. Eur J Nutr 2016;55:361–371pmid:25663641
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Campbell CL,
    2. Foegeding EA,
    3. Harris GK
    . Cocoa and whey protein differentially affect markers of lipid and glucose metabolism and satiety. J Med Food 2016;19:219–227pmid:26987021
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Scalbert A,
    2. Manach C,
    3. Morand C,
    4. Rémésy C,
    5. Jiménez L
    . Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2005;45:287–306pmid:16047496
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Matsui T,
    2. Ebuchi S,
    3. Kobayashi M, et al
    . Anti-hyperglycemic effect of diacylated anthocyanin derived from Ipomoea batatas cultivar Ayamurasaki can be achieved through the alpha-glucosidase inhibitory action. J Agric Food Chem 2002;50:7244–7248pmid:12452639
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Wedick NM,
    2. Pan A,
    3. Cassidy A, et al
    . Dietary flavonoid intakes and risk of type 2 diabetes in US men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:925–933pmid:22357723
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sun Q,
    2. Wedick NM,
    3. Pan A, et al
    . Gut microbiota metabolites of dietary lignans and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective investigation in two cohorts of U.S. women. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1287–1295pmid:24550220
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Tresserra-Rimbau A,
    2. Guasch-Ferré M,
    3. Salas-Salvadó J, et al.; PREDIMED Study Investigators
    . Intake of total polyphenols and some classes of polyphenols is inversely associated with diabetes in elderly people at high cardiovascular disease risk. J Nutr. 9 March 2016 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.3945/jn.115.223610pmid:26962181
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Yoon MS
    . The emerging role of branched-chain amino acids in insulin resistance and metabolism. Nutrients 2016;8:E405pmid:27376324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Abdul-Ghani MA,
    2. Matsuda M,
    3. Balas B,
    4. DeFronzo RA
    . Muscle and liver insulin resistance indexes derived from the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care 2007;30:89–94pmid:17192339
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Ferrannini E,
    2. Bjorkman O,
    3. Reichard GA Jr., et al
    . The disposal of an oral glucose load in healthy subjects. A quantitative study. Diabetes 1985;34:580–588pmid:3891471
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Zeevi D,
    2. Korem T,
    3. Zmora N, et al
    . Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell 2015;163:1079–1094pmid:26590418
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 42 (7)

In this Issue

July 2019, 42(7)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Wolffia globosa Mankai, a Green Aquatic Plant, on Postprandial Glycemic Response: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Wolffia globosa Mankai, a Green Aquatic Plant, on Postprandial Glycemic Response: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial
Hila Zelicha, Alon Kaplan, Anat Yaskolka Meir, Gal Tsaban, Ehud Rinott, Ilan Shelef, Amir Tirosh, Dov Brikner, Efrat Pupkin, Lu Qi, Joachim Thiery, Michael Stumvoll, Nora Kloting, Martin von Bergen, Uta Ceglarek, Matthias Blüher, Meir J. Stampfer, Iris Shai
Diabetes Care Jul 2019, 42 (7) 1162-1169; DOI: 10.2337/dc18-2319

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

The Effect of Wolffia globosa Mankai, a Green Aquatic Plant, on Postprandial Glycemic Response: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial
Hila Zelicha, Alon Kaplan, Anat Yaskolka Meir, Gal Tsaban, Ehud Rinott, Ilan Shelef, Amir Tirosh, Dov Brikner, Efrat Pupkin, Lu Qi, Joachim Thiery, Michael Stumvoll, Nora Kloting, Martin von Bergen, Uta Ceglarek, Matthias Blüher, Meir J. Stampfer, Iris Shai
Diabetes Care Jul 2019, 42 (7) 1162-1169; DOI: 10.2337/dc18-2319
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Not Only Diabetes but Also Prediabetes Leads to Functional Decline and Disability in Older Adults
  • Specific Dimensions of Depression Have Different Associations With Cognitive Decline in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes
  • Novel Biochemical Markers of Glycemia to Predict Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Show more Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.