The Association Between Poor Glycemic Control and Health Care Costs in People With Diabetes: A Population-Based Study
Article Figures & Tables
Tables
- Table 1
Mean per patient annual direct medical costs (in 2011 €)
Patients with HbA1c (N = 100,391) HbA1c <7% (N = 54,395) 7% ≥ HbA1c < 8% (N = 24,994) 8% ≥ HbA1c < 10% (N = 16,286) HbA1c ≥10% (N = 4,716) Patients without HbA1c (N = 26,419) Total costs 3,038.76 (6,580.76) 2,842.95 (6,233.06) 3,102.32 (7,292.54) 3,504.30 (6,548.69) 3,352.77 (6,520.38) 3,381.14 (12,049.61) Consultations with GP 607.52 (553.98) 585.24 (540.96) 620.52 (549.74) 654.01 (581.80) 635.16 (610.29) 460.94 (548.53) Hospitalization 1,203.58 (6,082.86) 1,131.46 (5,705.22) 1,197.99 (6,865.55) 1,396.55 (6,041.79) 1,398.63 (6,012.60) 1,681.00 (11,214) Referrals to specialist care 123.59 (164.85) 119.45 (160.32) 126.83 (164.75) 131.76 (177.93) 125.88 (168.44) 81.58 (142.35) Tests 14.72 (39.39) 14.44 (38.87) 15.66 (40.85) 14.45 (38.68) 13.94 (39.48) 9.76 (33.82) Self-monitoring test strips 49.95 (11.72) 49.89 (11.63) 50.23 (11.90) 49.85 (11.76) 49.44 (11.64) 50.46 (12.03) Medications 930.07 (986.09) 825.59 (938.43) 989.08 (999.08) 1,154.61 (1,052.55) 1,046.94 (1,046.14) 905.79 (1,276.16) Dialysis 34.16 (949.78) 43.44 (1,076.27) 23.53 (773.46) 25.90 (822.35) 11.91 (578.20) 147.49 (1,982.07) Data are mean (SD).
GP, general practitioner.
- Table 2
Results from the GLM regression with γ distribution and identity link on total costs
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Diabetes duration categories (reference: 0–2 years) 2–5 years 162.6*** (44.74) 127.9*** (41.71) 5–10 years 520.2*** (48.19) 347.9*** (43.78) >10 years 1,039*** (66.19) 738.7*** (60.68) HbA1c categories (reference: HbA1c <7%) 7% ≥ HbA1c < 8% 147.8*** (42.21) 127.5*** (39.11) 8% ≥ HbA1c < 10% 527.0*** (58.04) 395.1*** (52.64) HbA1c ≥10% 582.3*** (95.64) 428.3*** (86.16) Complications (reference: no complications) Macrovascular complications 1,516*** (97.51) Microvascular complications 844.1*** (69.74) Both types 2,091*** (83.61) Observations (n)a 90,874 90,874 AIC 17.947 17.892 BIC −1,001,518 −1,006,790 Log-likelihood −866,376.45 −863,723.18 Cost in 2011 €, with SEs given in parentheses. Model 1 adjusted for age (in categories), sex, BMI (in categories), hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, and smoking habits. Model 2 adds to model 1 whether the individual has any micro- or macrovascular complications or both. Reference categories: diabetes duration of <2 years, HbA1c <7% (models 1 and 2), and no vascular complications (model 2).
AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.
↵*** P < 0.01.
↵a Only individuals with complete data for all lifestyle factors (and any other variable included in the regressions) were included in the analyses (i.e., 90,874 patients in both models 1 and 2 out of 100,391 patients from the whole patient cohort).
- Table 3
Results from the two-part model on hospitalization costs
Variables First-part probit of two-part model, model 1† Second-part GLM with γ distribution and identity link of two-part model, model 1‡ First-part probit of two-part model, model 2† Second-part GLM with γ distribution and identity link of two-part model, model 2‡ Diabetes duration categories (reference: 0–2 years) 2–5 years 0.0529*** (0.0177) 147.6 (369.3) 0.0462*** (0.0178) 106.1 (362.0) 5–10 years 0.100*** (0.0161) 773.4** (339.1) 0.0791*** (0.0162) 568.3* (333.2) >10 years 0.191*** (0.0175) 1,215*** (373.7) 0.151*** (0.0177) 910.9** (371.1) HbA1c categories (reference: HbA1c <7%) 7% ≥ HbA1c < 8% 0.0103 (0.0124) 109.9 (268.4) −0.000905 (0.0124) 87.46 (262.6) 8% ≥ HbA1c < 10% 0.0793*** (0.0144) 927.5*** (330.3) 0.0500*** (0.0146) 811.1** (323.6) HbA1c ≥10% 0.169*** (0.0243) 843.6 (552.1) 0.126*** (0.0246) 636.8 (541.8) Complications (reference: no complications) Macrovascular complications 0.297*** (0.0173) 1,733*** (388.8) Microvascular complications 0.201*** (0.0162) 974.5*** (357.5) Both types 0.358*** (0.0138) 2,323*** (320.1) Constant −1.688*** (0.0369) 4,521*** (693.5) −1.677*** (0.0370) 4,404*** (690.8) Observations (n) 90,874 13,837 90,874 13,837 AIC 20.06 20.04 BIC −117,709.7 −117,854.6 Log-likelihood −38,835.91 −138,739.50 −38,424.52 −138,652.77 Model 1 adjusted for age (in categories), sex, BMI (in categories), hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, and smoking habits. Model 2 adds to model 1 whether the individual has any micro- or macrovascular complications or both. Reference categories: diabetes duration of <2 years, HbA1c <7% (models 1 and 2), and no vascular complications (model 2).
AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.
↵† The coefficient denotes probability (e.g., 0.0529 has to be interpreted as a 5.29% increase in the probability of being admitted to hospital). SEs are given in parentheses.
↵‡ Costs in 2011 €, with SEs given in parentheses.
↵* P < 0.1;
↵** P < 0.05;
↵*** P < 0.01.
- Table 4
Results from the GLM regression with γ distribution and log link on treatment costs
Variables Model 1† Model 2† Diabetes duration categories (reference: 0–2 years) 2–5 years 0.148*** (0.0122) 0.140*** (0.0122) 5–10 years 0.313*** (0.0112) 0.284*** (0.0112) >10 years 0.430*** (0.0125) 0.375*** (0.0126) HbA1c categories (reference: HbA1c <7%) 7% ≥ HbA1c < 8% 0.132*** (0.00907) 0.119*** (0.00908) 8% ≥ HbA1c < 10% 0.308*** (0.0107) 0.275*** (0.0108) HbA1c ≥10% 0.336*** (0.0182) 0.281*** (0.0183) Complications (reference: no complications) Macrovascular complications 0.384*** (0.0135) Microvascular complications 0.270*** (0.0121) Both types 0.552*** (0.0107) Observations (n) 90,874 90,874 AIC 15.56 15.52 BIC −1,012,478 −1,016,589 Log-likelihood −751,214.62 −749,055.06 Model 1 adjusted for age (in categories), sex, BMI (in categories), hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, and smoking habits. Model 2 adds to model 1 whether the individual has any micro- or macrovascular complications or both. Reference categories: diabetes duration of <2 years, HbA1c <7% (models 1 and 2), and no vascular complications (model 2).
AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion.
↵† The coefficient denotes probability (e.g., 0.148 has to be interpreted as a 14.8% increase in treatment costs). SEs are given in parentheses.
↵*** P < 0.01.