Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Epidemiology/Health Services Research

The Impact of Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease on Life Expectancy and Direct Medical Cost in a 10-Year Diabetes Cohort Study

  1. Eric Yuk Fai Wan1,2⇑,
  2. Weng Yee Chin1⇑,
  3. Esther Yee Tak Yu1,
  4. Ian Chi Kei Wong2,3,
  5. Esther Wai Yin Chan4,
  6. Shirley Xue Li4,5,6,
  7. Nico Kwan Lok Cheung1,
  8. Yuan Wang1 and
  9. Cindy Lo Kuen Lam1
  1. 1Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  2. 2Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  3. 3Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, U.K.
  4. 4Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  5. 5Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  6. 6Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Social Science, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  1. Corresponding authors: Eric Yuk Fai Wan, yfwan{at}hku.hk, and Weng Yee Chin, chinwy{at}hku.hk
Diabetes Care 2020 Aug; 43(8): 1750-1758. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-2137
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The relative effects of various cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and varying severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on mortality risk, direct medical cost, and life expectancy in patients with diabetes are unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate these associations.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study that included 208,792 adults with diabetes stratified into 12 disease status groups with varying combinations of heart disease, stroke, moderate CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2) and severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) in 2008–2010. The effect of risk of mortality, annual direct medical costs, and life expectancy were assessed using Cox regression, gamma generalized linear method with log-link function, and flexible parametric survival models.

RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 8.5 years (1.6 million patient-years), 50,154 deaths were recorded. Mortality risks for patients with only a single condition among heart disease, stroke, and moderate CKD were similar. The mortality risks were 1.75 times, 2.63 times, and 3.58 times greater for patients with one, two, and all three conditions (consisting of stroke, heart disease, and moderate CKD), compared with patients without these diseases, suggesting an independent and individually additive effect for any combination. A similar trend was observed in annual public health care costs with 2.91-, 3.90-, and 3.88-fold increased costs for patients with one, two, and three conditions, respectively. Increases in the number of conditions reduced life expectancy greatly, particularly in younger patients. Reduction in life expectancy for a 40-year-old with one, two, and three conditions was 20, 25, and 30 years for men and 25, 30, and 35 years, respectively, for women. A similar trend of greater magnitude was observed for severe CKD.

CONCLUSIONS The effects of heart diseases, stroke, CKD, and the combination of these conditions on all-cause mortality and direct medical costs are independent and cumulative. CKD, especially severe CKD, appears to have a particularly significant impact on life expectancy and direct medical costs in patients with diabetes. These findings support the importance of preventing both CVD and CKD in patients with diabetes.

Introduction

Diabetes is a highly prevalent noncommunicable disease, affecting 451 million people and causing 5 million deaths worldwide in 2017 (1). It is estimated that the number of patients with diabetes will rise to 693 million by 2045 (1). The annual global medical costs for patients with diabetes was estimated to be ∼$612-$1,099 billion (U.S. dollars) in 2014 (2). The average medical cost spent on each patient with diabetes was 2.3 times higher than on those patients without diabetes (3). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and chronic kidney diseases (CKDs) are two major causes of morbidity, affecting 20–40% of patients with diabetes (4–6). The number of CVD incidences increased by >25% during the period from 1990 to 2010, whereas that of CKD doubled in the general population (7). Given that life expectancy is increasing, the prevalence of CVD and CKD among all patients with diabetes will keep growing, and thus increase the economic burden as well as premature mortality.

Some studies have suggested that the mortality risks for CVD and CKD are similar in the general population (8,9). Nevertheless, most studies conducted among patients with diabetes have assessed the mortality risk caused by either CVD or CKD alone (10–14). Moreover, the results to date have been inconsistent in that the relative mortality risks have ranged from 1.5 to 3.3 for CVD and from 0.94 to 5.0 for CKD (10–15). It is therefore hard to compare the differences between the burden of the CVD and CKD. The impact of the comorbid CVD and CKD is also unclear, such as whether the effect on CVD and CKD is additive or multiplicative remains unknown. There is currently only limited evidence demonstrating the actual reduction of life expectancy among these patients, which is more clinically meaningful and easy to understand. In addition, the medical cost for treating CVD and CKD among patients with diabetes has been inconsistent between studies (16,17). The most appropriate method to evaluate these associations is to estimate the burden of CVD and CKD in the same cohort. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of CVD and CKD individually and jointly on mortality risks, life expectancy, and direct medical costs based on a 10-year Hong Kong diabetes cohort. This will help facilitate the development of health care policies, including resource allocation and treatment prioritization for the prevention of CVD and CKD for patients with diabetes.

Research Design and Methods

Study Design

This population-based retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18 years or older with the diagnosis of diabetes and managed by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority over the period between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2010. The Hong Kong Hospital Authority is the statutory body that manages all of the public-sector hospitals and primary care clinics in Hong Kong. It is responsible for managing >90% of patients with diabetes because the health services are heavily subsidized by the Hong Kong government (18). The ecology of Hong Kong health care system is comparable to the U.S. and U.K. The monthly rates for outpatient care used in Hong Kong are higher compared with the U.S. and U.K., but the use of hospital-based events, including accident and emergency attendances and hospitalizations, is similar (19). The International Classification of Primary Care-2 (ICPC-2) codes of “T89” or “T90” are used to define the clinical diagnoses of DM. Baseline was defined as the first attendance of a doctor consultation in a primary care outpatient clinic during the inclusion period.

Ethics approval was received from the Institutional Review Boards of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority (Ref: UW 15-259). Consent from individual subjects was not needed because all patient records were retrieved from the computerized administrative system of the Hospital Authority anonymously.

Disease Status Groups

Subjects were divided into 12 mutually exclusive disease and disease combination groups at the baseline: 1) none of these (reference group); 2) stroke; 3) heart diseases, including coronary heart disease and heart failure; 4) moderate CKD; 5) severe CKD; 6) stroke and heart diseases; 7) heart diseases and moderate CKD; 8) stroke and moderate CKD; 9) stroke and severe CKD; 10) heart diseases and severe CKD; 11) stroke, heart diseases, and moderate CKD; 12) stroke, heart diseases, and severe CKD. The diagnoses of CVD and CKD were defined according to the diagnostic codes of the ICPC-2 or the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Clinical Modification. Moderate CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and severe CKD as eGFR of <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (as described in Supplementary Table 1).

Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Mortality data were obtained from the Hong Kong Death Registry, a population-based official government registry with the registered death records of all Hong Kong citizens. Meanwhile, secondary outcomes were the annual direct medical cost and life expectancy. The total medical cost per patient was calculated by the product of the frequency of attendance and the unit cost of attendance. It included the use of medical services, such as general and specialist outpatient clinics, allied health professional services (including clinical psychologists, dietitians, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists), accident and emergency services, and hospital inpatient services. The frequency for health service use was retrieved from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority computerized administrative system. The unit cost of relevant health service use was based on the published costs according to the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Gazette and Hospital Authority Ordinance (chapter 113) in 2013 (20). The unit cost is based on a cost recovery basis and is the lump sum covering all medical services used during the visits, including consultation, investigations, medications, and other treatments used. The annual public direct medical costs referred to the total cost for each kind of health service attendance.

Baseline Covariates

The patients’ sociodemographics, behavior characteristics, clinical parameters, disease characteristics, and treatment modalities are the baseline covariates. Sociodemographics parameters include sex and age. Behavior characteristics include smoking status. Clinical parameters consist of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and BMI. Disease characteristics include self-reported duration of diabetes medication treatment, consisting of the use of antihypertensive drugs, including ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and other antihypertensive drugs, the use of antidiabetes drugs, and the use of lipid-lowering agents at baseline. All laboratory tests were conducted in Hospital Authority laboratories using the same protocol and accredited by the College of American Pathologists, the Hong Kong Accreditation Service, or the National Association of Testing Authorities, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Data Analysis

Multiple imputation was used to handle all missing baseline covariates to minimize potential bias influenced by missing data (21). The chained equation method was used to impute all the missing data five times with all baseline covariates and mortality outcome. Pooled estimates and the corresponding 95% CIs were calculated based on the Rubin rule (22). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patients’ characteristics for each disease status group. Cumulative incidences and incidence rates for all-cause mortality with 95% CIs were calculated. Incidence rates for outcome events were estimated based on the 95% CI under Poisson distribution (23). To evaluate the associations between disease group status and primary outcome, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used with adjustments based on all baseline characteristics. Proportional hazards assumptions were also considered while fitting the multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models by using the scaled Schoenfeld residuals plots against time for the covariates. The variance inflation factor was used to determine the presence of multicollinearity. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% CIs and P values were reported accordingly. Three measurements, 1) the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), 2) the attributable proportion due to interaction (AP), and 3) the synergy index (SI), were used to examine the additive or multiplicative interaction between disease status groups based on the adjusted HRs from the Cox regression. RERI and AP equaling 0 and SI equaling 1 indicated the absence of an interaction effect (24) and suggested an additive interaction between disease status groups.

Subgroup analyses were used to determine whether there were any relationships between different disease status groups and mortality. Stratification was by sex (men, women), age (<65 years, ≥65 years), smoking status (nonsmoker, smoker), duration of diabetes (<5 years, ≥5 years), BMI (<27.5 kg/m2, ≥27.5 kg/m2), blood pressure (SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg, SBP/DBP ≥130/80 mmHg), HbA1c (<7%, ≥7%), LDL-C (<2.6 mmol/L, ≥2.6 mmol/L), the use of antihypertension drugs (no, yes), the use of antidiabetes drugs (no, yes), and the use of lipid-lowering drugs (no, yes) at baseline.

For secondary outcomes, the estimated direct medical cost incurred for each disease status group per year was calculated using the mean of the annual cost of health service attendances within 5-years after baseline. A generalized linear method with gamma family, log-link function, and adjusting for baseline characteristics was used to evaluate the adjusted difference in annual cost of public health service use among disease status groups. This model could be used in the application of estimating the additive effect of complications on medical costs (17,25,26). Meanwhile, a flexible parametric survival model for relative survival was used to estimate the life expectancy losses within different disease status groups (27). This model could calculate the life expectancy (28–30) based on the measurement of loss in expectation of life by extrapolating the estimated linear trend at the end of the follow-up period without consideration of any proportional hazards model assumption. Age and sex were considered as covariates with time-dependent effects. Restricted cubic splines were used to model age continuously and nonlinearly.

All significance tests were two-tailed and considered statistically significant if P values were <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata version 13.0 software.

Data and Resource Availability

Owing to the confidentiality of the data used for this study and strict privacy policy from the data holder that the data can be kept among the designated research personnel only, the data cannot be provided to others, whether or not the data are made anonymous.

Results

At total of 208,792 patients with diabetes were identified and included for analysis in this cohort study. Of these, 11,922 (5.7%), 10,736 (5.1%), 11,367 (5.4%), and 1,114 (0.5%) had stroke, heart diseases, moderate CKD and severe CKD, respectively. Among all patients with diabetes, 35,139 patients (16.8%) had one condition of stroke, heart disease, or CKD, 6,981 (3.3%) had two conditions, and 801 (0.4%) had three conditions. Supplementary Table 2 summarizes the data completion rates for each baseline covariate (with >75% data completion on average). Table 1 reports the baseline characteristics of the cohort by disease group status. In general, the average age of the subjects was 65 (SD 12) years old, where women accounted for 54% of the cohort.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients by disease status after multiple imputation

After a median follow-up period of 8.5 years (1.6 million patient-years), there were 50,154 deaths. Table 2 reports the incidence rate for mortality ranged from 2.11 to 40.95 per 100 patient-years among the different disease status groups. The trend in the incidence rate increased from one, two, and three conditions among stroke, heart, and moderate CKD. In particular, the incidence rate for mortality in patients with severe CKD was higher than any combination of stroke, heart, and moderate CKD. A similar pattern of HRs was observed after adjusting for other covariates, as reported in Table 2. The mortality risk was higher for patients with more conditions among CKD, heart disease, and stroke. Compared with those without a history of CKD and CVD, the adjusted HRs for subjects with one, two, and three conditions among stroke, heart disease, and moderate CKD was increased by 1.75 times, 2.63 times, and 3.58 times, respectively. The mortality risk for patients with severe CKD was much higher. Supplementary Table 3 demonstrates that RERI, AP, and SI for stroke, heart disease, moderate/severe CKD, except for stroke, and severe CKD absented the interaction effect, which suggests that it is more likely that there is an additive interaction between disease status groups. Supplementary Table 4 shows comparable patterns in different subgroups compared with the main analysis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Incidence rate and adjusted hazard ratios of all-cause mortality by disease status at baseline

Table 3 summarizes the estimated public direct medical costs per annum, ranging from $4,065 to $35,362 (U.S. dollars) across the different disease status groups. A similar trend was observed in the mortality rates, with an incremental increase in medical costs with a cumulative increase in number of conditions. The annual public medical cost for patients with diabetes with one, two, and three conditions among stroke, heart disease, and moderate CKD increased by 1.91 times, 2.90 times, and 3.88 times compared with those without a history of CKD and CVD respectively. The medical costs for patients with severe CKD alone or in a combination of stroke and heart disease was much higher. More detailed findings are provided in Table 3.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Estimation of annual public direct medical cost by disease status at baseline

Figure 1 shows the estimated loss of life expectancy for different disease status groups (with comparison group). The estimated life expectancy loss for men (women) aged 40 years old with stroke, heart diseases, and moderate CKD was nearly 21.1 years (95% CI 15.5–26.6) (women 26.2 years [95% CI 20.6–31.9]), 16.6 years (95% CI 9.6–23.7) (women 21.7 years [95% CI 14.0–29.5]), 23.2 years (95% CI 18.6–27.7) (women 28.3 years [95% CI 23.7–32.9]), and 31.5 years (95% CI 30.2–32.7) (women 36.3 years [95% CI 35.0–37.7]), respectively. In addition, the estimated life expectancy loss for men (women) with severe CKD or in a combination of any two or three conditions was even more prominent, with the results shown in Fig. 1. The life expectancy loss for patients of younger age was much larger than that of older patients, but the reduction in life expectancy for elderly was still high. For instance, the years of life lost for 40-year-old men (women) with diabetes with stroke, heart disease, and severe CKD was 18.9 (95% CI 18.2–19.6) (women 22.6 [95% CI 21.9–23.4]).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

A: Years of life lost by disease status for women at baseline compared with those with neither stroke, heart disease, nor moderate/severe CKD. B: Years of life lost by disease status for men at baseline compared with those with neither stroke nor heart disease nor moderate/severe CKD.

Conclusions

This large cohort study involved >50,000 incident deaths across 1.59 million patient-years at risk and contributes to the evidence for estimating mortality risk, direct medical costs, and life expectancy loss due to various combinations of CVD and CKD for patients with diabetes. The findings demonstrated similar mortality risks associated with stroke, heart diseases, and moderate CKD. This supports the recommendation from the National Kidney Foundation and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association that CKD should be treated as a CHD risk equivalent (31,32). Our analyses also found the effect of stroke, heart diseases, and moderate CKD on mortality risk were individually additive and nonoverlapping for any combination. The mortality risk associated with severe CKD is larger than the combined effects of stroke, heart diseases, and moderate CKD. Similar patterns were observed for direct medical costs. Additionally, increases in the number of conditions reduced life expectancy greatly, particularly among younger patients.

No previous study has yet evaluated the individual and combined effect of CVD and CKD on mortality risk and direct medical cost among DM patients. A few studies conducted in the general population have found that patients with stroke, heart diseases, and CKD had similar mortality risks and direct medical costs (33,34). Our study confirmed this finding and extended the impact of these combinations of diseases on mortality risks and direct medical cost in patients with DM. In this cohort of patients with DM, the risks were observed to be additive and nonoverlapping. The increase in the number of conditions, including stroke, heart disease, and CKD, corresponded to the rise in mortality risks and direct medical costs. Our findings provide further evidence for the importance of CVD prevention among patients with CKD and the prevention of CKD among patients with CVD (31,35,36) and suggest that prevention of CVD and CKD might play equally important roles in decreasing the disease burden in patients with diabetes. A previous study conducted in the Canadian general population demonstrated similar mortality risks for patients with CHD and those with moderate to severe CKD (9). Our results partially confirmed this finding because of the substantially higher mortality risk associated with severe CKD compared with coronary heart disease (CHD) among patients with diabetes. We recommend that the effect of severe CKD and moderate CKD should be considered independently when evaluating mortality risks and that prevention of severe CKD be prioritized.

The data from the 1950–1980s Framingham Heart Study with 9,033 participants demonstrated that men and women aged 50 years with diabetes and CVD had 7.1 years’ and 6.8 years’ reduction in life expectancy, respectively, compared with those without CVD (37). The results were lower than our expectation. One potential explanation could be the rapid increase in global life expectancy between 1950 and 2010 (38). Although ethnic differences and the historical characteristics of the Framingham Heart Study discourage extrapolation of those findings to the current context, our sample size was much larger, and more detailed analytical techniques were used, which can provide more reliable results. Meanwhile, two large, general population cohort studies demonstrated a reduction of life expectancy for Taiwanese people aged 60 with moderate and severe CKD was ∼4–13 years but was 4–9 years among Canadian subjects (33). These years of life loss results were less than those observed in our current study because our study population was limited to patients with diabetes. Patients with diabetes have an average of ∼8–10 years life expectancy loss compared with those without diabetes (14,37). Hence, our findings would likely be similar to the previous studies if diabetes was taken into account. The average life expectancy loss for men and women with stroke, heart diseases, and severe CKD within the age-group of 40–60 years (decrease by 37 years and 21 years, respectively) were surprising in that they were larger than the 10-year loss for lifelong smokers and 11-year loss for those with HIV infection (39–41).

Our findings demonstrated that ∼20% of our cohort of patients with diabetes had at least one complication among CKD, stroke, and heart diseases. Limited symptoms could be observed at the earlier stages of CKD because of the difficulty in discovering the symptoms related to uremia until the latest stage with severe CKD (42). Therefore, the early stages of CKD could gradually progress to severe CKD asymptomatically. Previous studies in Taiwan showed an underdiagnosis, undertreatment, and lack of awareness for CKD (43). A review suggested that early treatments, including an education program and pharmacologic therapies, might help to reverse the early stages of CKD (44). In addition, most treatment guidelines currently focus primarily on CVD risk screening, with care plans stratified by risk. Even though various common risk factors are recognized for both CKD and CVD, proper screening for early identification and management for CKD could potentially slow down or even prevent CKD deterioration. While many clinicians focus on the importance in controlling and preventing CVD, the severity and prevention of CKD may be easily neglected. Our findings highlight the importance of CKD management for patients with diabetes directed at preventing and delaying CKD deterioration.

One major strength of this cohort study was the large sample size of patients with diabetes monitored in primary care. All missing data handling was conducted using multiple imputation and multiple adjustment with some confounding variables included to show the comparison of burdens between CKD and CVD. Using data extracted from the Hong Kong Hospital Authority’s administrative database ensured that the patient data were accurate and reliable.

There are also several potential limitations. Only patients with diabetes in Hong Kong were included in our study. Mortality risks, direct medical cost, and health policies vary with time, and thus, our findings might be inappropriate to extend to the general population and to patients with diabetes living in other countries or regions. Researchers should be cautious if extrapolating our study findings to other settings. Some potential confounding variables, such as drug compliance and use and socioeconomic characteristics, were not considered in this study. Duration of diabetes was self-reported and liable to self-report biases. However, our data analysis included the main clinical parameters and different medications. Approximately 1% of the patients included in this cohort had a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Owing to the small sample size, our analyses were not able to be stratified by diabetes type. Hence, the results in study are largely only generalizable to patients with type 2 diabetes. The ICPC-2 codes were used to identify patients with diabetes because International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Clinical Modification codes for diabetes were unavailable in our data set, and thus, our cohort missed patients who were not coded with an ICPC-2 diabetes code. Our multiple imputation model did not include the medical costs for all missing predictors. Lastly, further studies with longer follow-up periods are required to make an accurate estimation of the projection of life expectancy.

Conclusion

This cohort study found high mortality risks and large annual public direct medical cost associated with the burden of with severe CKD among patients with diabetes. Our findings demonstrated similar burdens were incurred by those with a history of moderate CKD, stroke, and heart diseases, which were closely additive and nonoverlapping for different disease combinations. The estimated life expectancy of patients with diabetes with CKD and CVD drops gradually as disease severity deteriorates. Our findings highlight the importance of long term CKD and CVD management and prevention in patients with diabetes.

Article Information

Acknowledgments. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority.

Funding. The study received support from the Health Services Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (ref. no. 14151181).

No funding organization had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation of the manuscript.

Duality of Interest. I.C.K.W. received funding from Pfizer, Bayer, and Novartis to evaluate real-world evidence on pharmacological treatments of CVDs but not related to the current study. E.W.Y.C. received research grants from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen (a Division of Johnson and Johnson), Pfizer, and Takeda to evaluate real-world evidence on pharmacological treatments of CVDs but not related to the current study. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. E.Y.F.W. and C.L.K.L. contributed to the study design and acquisition of data, researched the data, contributed to the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results, and wrote the manuscript. W.Y.C. wrote the manuscript, contributed to the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and reviewed and edited the manuscript. E.Y.F.W. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Footnotes

  • This article contains supplementary material online at https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.12194913.

  • Received October 25, 2019.
  • Accepted April 24, 2020.
  • © 2020 by the American Diabetes Association
https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cho NH,
    2. Shaw JE,
    3. Karuranga S, et al
    . IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;138:271–281
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. da Rocha Fernandes J,
    2. Ogurtsova K,
    3. Linnenkamp U, et al
    . IDF Diabetes Atlas estimates of 2014 global health expenditures on diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016;117:48–54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. American Diabetes Association
    . Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care 2018;41:917–928
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Naghavi M,
    3. Allen C, et al.; GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators
    . Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1459–1544
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Perkovic V,
    2. Agarwal R,
    3. Fioretto P, et al.; Conference Participants
    . Management of patients with diabetes and CKD: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int 2016;90:1175–1183
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Young BA,
    2. Maynard C,
    3. Boyko EJ
    . Racial differences in diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in a national population of veterans. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2392–2399
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Danaei G,
    2. Lu Y,
    3. Singh GM, et al.; Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors for Chronic Diseases Collaboration
    . Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mortality burden of cardiometabolic risk factors from 1980 to 2010: a comparative risk assessment. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014;2:634–647
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Athyros VG,
    2. Katsiki N,
    3. Karagiannis A,
    4. Mikhailidis DP
    . Editorial: should chronic kidney disease be considered as a coronary heart disease equivalent? Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2012;10:374–377
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tonelli M,
    2. Muntner P,
    3. Lloyd A, et al.; Alberta Kidney Disease Network
    . Risk of coronary events in people with chronic kidney disease compared with those with diabetes: a population-level cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:807–814
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Jia W,
    2. Gao X,
    3. Pang C, et al
    . Prevalence and risk factors of albuminuria and chronic kidney disease in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose regulation: Shanghai diabetic complications study (SHDCS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24:3724–3731
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Booth GL,
    2. Kapral MK,
    3. Fung K,
    4. Tu JV
    . Relation between age and cardiovascular disease in men and women with diabetes compared with non-diabetic people: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2006;368:29–36
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Tancredi M,
    2. Rosengren A,
    3. Svensson A-M, et al
    . Excess mortality among persons with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1720–1732
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Robinson TE,
    2. Elley CR,
    3. Kenealy T,
    4. Drury PL
    . Development and validation of a predictive risk model for all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015;108:482–488
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Wen CP,
    2. Chang CH,
    3. Tsai MK, et al
    . Diabetes with early kidney involvement may shorten life expectancy by 16 years. Kidney Int 2017;92:388–396
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Tonelli M,
    2. Wiebe N,
    3. Culleton B, et al
    . Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: a systematic review. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2034–2047
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Laliberté F,
    2. Bookhart BK,
    3. Vekeman F, et al
    . Direct all-cause health care costs associated with chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes and hypertension: a managed care perspective. J Manag Care Pharm 2009;15:312–322
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Jiao F,
    2. Wong CKH,
    3. Tang SCW, et al
    . Annual direct medical costs associated with diabetes-related complications in the event year and in subsequent years in Hong Kong. Diabet Med 2017;34:1276–1283
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Lau IT
    . A clinical practice guideline to guide a system approach to diabetes care in Hong Kong. Diabetes Metab J 2017;41:81–88
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Leung GM,
    2. Wong IO,
    3. Chan W-S,
    4. Choi S,
    5. Lo S-V; Health Care Financing Study Group
    . The ecology of health care in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:577–590
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
    . Hospital Authority Ordinance (Chapter 113): Revisions to List of Charges [Internet]. 22 March 2013. Available from: https://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/20131712/egn201317121488.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2019
  17. ↵
    1. Royston P
    . Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J 2004;4:227–241
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Rubin DB
    . Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2004
  19. ↵
    1. Ulm K
    . A simple method to calculate the confidence interval of a standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:373–375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Hosmer DW,
    2. Lemeshow S
    . Confidence interval estimation of interaction. Epidemiology 1992;3:452–456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Manning WG,
    2. Mullahy J
    . Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ 2001;20:461–494
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Clarke P,
    2. Gray A,
    3. Legood R,
    4. Briggs A,
    5. Holman R
    . The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: results from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS Study No. 65). Diabet Med 2003;20:442–450
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Royston P,
    2. Lambert PC
    . Flexible Parametric Survival Analysis Using Stata: Beyond the Cox Model. College Station, TX, Stata Press, 2011
  24. ↵
    1. Andersson TML,
    2. Dickman PW,
    3. Eloranta S,
    4. Lambe M,
    5. Lambert PC
    . Estimating the loss in expectation of life due to cancer using flexible parametric survival models. Stat Med 2013;32:5286–5300
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nordio M,
    2. Limido A,
    3. Maggiore U,
    4. Nichelatti M,
    5. Postorino M,
    6. Quintaliani G; Italian Dialysis and Transplantation Registry
    . Survival in patients treated by long-term dialysis compared with the general population. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;59:819–828
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Nelson CP,
    2. Lambert PC,
    3. Squire IB,
    4. Jones DR
    . Relative survival: what can cardiovascular disease learn from cancer? Eur Heart J 2008;29:941–947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Sarnak MJ,
    2. Levey AS,
    3. Schoolwerth AC, et al.; American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention
    . Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2003;108:2154–2169
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Weiner DE,
    2. Tighiouart H,
    3. Stark PC, et al
    . Kidney disease as a risk factor for recurrent cardiovascular disease and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 2004;44:198–206
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Gansevoort RT,
    2. Correa-Rotter R,
    3. Hemmelgarn BR, et al
    . Chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk: epidemiology, mechanisms, and prevention. Lancet 2013;382:339–352
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Muka T,
    2. Imo D,
    3. Jaspers L, et al
    . The global impact of non-communicable diseases on healthcare spending and national income: a systematic review. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30:251–277
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Shiba N,
    2. Shimokawa H
    . Chronic kidney disease and heart failure--bidirectional close link and common therapeutic goal. J Cardiol 2011;57:8–17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Barrows IR,
    2. Raj DS
    . Janus face of coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e003596
  32. ↵
    1. Franco OH,
    2. Steyerberg EW,
    3. Hu FB,
    4. Mackenbach J,
    5. Nusselder W
    . Associations of diabetes mellitus with total life expectancy and life expectancy with and without cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1145–1151
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. World Health Organization
    . Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2015
  34. ↵
    1. Doll R,
    2. Peto R,
    3. Boreham J,
    4. Sutherland I
    . Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ 2004;328:1519
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. May M,
    2. Gompels M,
    3. Delpech V, et al
    . Impact of late diagnosis and treatment on life expectancy in people with HIV-1: UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study. BMJ 2011;343:d6016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Lohse N,
    2. Hansen A-BE,
    3. Pedersen G, et al
    . Survival of persons with and without HIV infection in Denmark, 1995-2005. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:87–95
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Li PK-T,
    2. Kwan BC-H,
    3. Leung CB, et al.; Hong Kong Society of Nephrology
    . Prevalence of silent kidney disease in Hong Kong: the screening for Hong Kong Asymptomatic Renal Population and Evaluation (SHARE) program. Kidney Int Suppl 2005;67:S36–S40
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Wen CP,
    2. Cheng TYD,
    3. Tsai MK, et al
    . All-cause mortality attributable to chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study based on 462 293 adults in Taiwan. Lancet 2008;371:2173–2182
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Morrison AS
    . Screening in Chronic Disease. New York, Oxford University Press, 1992
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 43 (8)

In this Issue

August 2020, 43(8)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Impact of Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease on Life Expectancy and Direct Medical Cost in a 10-Year Diabetes Cohort Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Impact of Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease on Life Expectancy and Direct Medical Cost in a 10-Year Diabetes Cohort Study
Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Weng Yee Chin, Esther Yee Tak Yu, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Esther Wai Yin Chan, Shirley Xue Li, Nico Kwan Lok Cheung, Yuan Wang, Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
Diabetes Care Aug 2020, 43 (8) 1750-1758; DOI: 10.2337/dc19-2137

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

The Impact of Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease on Life Expectancy and Direct Medical Cost in a 10-Year Diabetes Cohort Study
Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Weng Yee Chin, Esther Yee Tak Yu, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Esther Wai Yin Chan, Shirley Xue Li, Nico Kwan Lok Cheung, Yuan Wang, Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
Diabetes Care Aug 2020, 43 (8) 1750-1758; DOI: 10.2337/dc19-2137
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Health Care Use and Costs in Individuals With Diabetes With and Without Comorbid Depression in Germany: Results of the Cross-sectional DiaDec Study
  • Advanced Liver Fibrosis Is Common in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Followed in the Outpatient Setting: The Need for Systematic Screening
  • Exercise During the First Trimester of Pregnancy and the Risks of Abnormal Screening and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Show more Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Epidemiology-Diabetes Complications

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.