Abstract
OBJECTIVE To prove equivalence of individual, clinically titrated basal insulin doses of glargine 300 units⋅mL−1 (Gla-300) and degludec 100 units⋅mL−1 (Deg-100) under steady state conditions in a single-blind, randomized, crossover study, on the glucose pharmacodynamics (PD) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Subjects with T1D (N = 22, 11 men, age 44.3 ± 12.4 years, disease duration 25.5 ± 11.7 years, A1C 7.07 ± 0.63% [53.7 ± 6.9 mmol⋅mL−1], BMI 22.5 ± 2.7 kg·m−2), naïve to Gla-300 and Deg-100, underwent 24-h euglycemic clamps with individual clinical doses of Gla-300 (0.34 ± 0.08 units ⋅ kg−1) and Deg-100 (0.26 ± 0.06 units ⋅ kg−1), dosing at 2000 h, after 3 months of optimal titration of basal (and bolus) insulin.
RESULTS At the end of 3 months, Gla-300 and Deg-100 reduced slightly and, similarly, A1C versus baseline. Clamp average plasma glucose (0–24 h) was euglycemic with both insulins. The area under curve of glucose infused (AUC-GIR[0–24 h[) was equivalent for the two insulins (ratio 1.04, 90% CI 0.91–1.18). Suppression of endogenous glucose production, free fatty acids, glycerol, and β-hydroxybutyrate was 9%, 14%, 14%, and 18% greater, respectively, with Gla-300 compared with Deg-100 during the first 12 h, while glucagon suppression was no different. Relative within-day PD variability was 23% lower with Gla-300 versus Deg-100 (ratio 0.77, 90% CI 0.63–0.92).
CONCLUSIONS In T1D, individualized, clinically titrated doses of Gla-300 and Deg-100 at steady state result in similar glycemic control and PD equivalence during euglycemic clamps. Clinical doses of Gla-300 compared with Deg-100 are higher and associated with quite similar even 24-h distribution of PD and antilipolytic effects.
Footnotes
This article contains supplementary material online at https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.13103027.
- Received May 3, 2020.
- Accepted October 12, 2020.
- © 2020 by the American Diabetes Association
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.