PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Utzschneider, Kristina M.
AU  - Prigeon, Ronald L.
AU  - Faulenbach, Mirjam V.
AU  - Tong, Jenny
AU  - Carr, Darcy B.
AU  - Boyko, Edward J.
AU  - Leonetti, Donna L.
AU  - McNeely, Marguerite J.
AU  - Fujimoto, Wilfred Y.
AU  - Kahn, Steven E.
TI  - Oral Disposition Index Predicts the Development of Future Diabetes Above and Beyond Fasting and 2-h Glucose Levels
AID  - 10.2337/dc08-1478
DP  - 2009 Feb 01
TA  - Diabetes Care
PG  - 335--341
VI  - 32
IP  - 2
4099  - http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/32/2/335.short
4100  - http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/32/2/335.full
SO  - Diabetes Care2009 Feb 01; 32
AB  - OBJECTIVE—We sought to determine whether an oral disposition index (DIO) predicts the development of diabetes over a 10-year period. First, we assessed the validity of the DIO by demonstrating that a hyperbolic relationship exists between oral indexes of insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 613 Japanese-American subjects (322 men and 291 women) underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at baseline, 5 years, and 10 years. Insulin sensitivity was estimated as 1/fasting insulin or homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S). Insulin response was estimated as the change in insulin divided by change in glucose from 0 to 30 min (ΔI0–30/ΔG0–30). RESULTS—ΔI0–30/ΔG0–30 demonstrated a curvilinear relationship with 1/fasting insulin and HOMA-S with a left and downward shift as glucose tolerance deteriorated. The confidence limits for the slope of the loge-transformed estimates included −1 for ΔI0–30/ΔG0–30 versus 1/fasting insulin for all glucose tolerance groups, consistent with a hyperbolic relationship. When HOMA-S was used as the insulin sensitivity measure, the confidence limits for the slope included −1 only for subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) but not diabetes. On the basis of this hyperbolic relationship, the product of ΔI0–30/ΔG0–30 and 1/fasting insulin was calculated (DIO) and decreased from NGT to IFG/IGT to diabetes (P < 0.001). Among nondiabetic subjects at baseline, baseline DIO predicted cumulative diabetes at 10 years (P < 0.001) independent of age, sex, BMI, family history of diabetes, and baseline fasting and 2-h glucose concentrations. CONCLUSIONS—The DIO provides a measure of β-cell function adjusted for insulin sensitivity and is predictive of development of diabetes over 10 years.